The service of summons was defective in that it failed to state affirmatively that respondent should appear and did not specify the fuse date, time or place for appearance. Applicant, the father, sued respondent, the mother, for custody of a child. Cause 8-D-67; 26/5/67; Georges, C fuse. Emmanuel Makaidi, Misc.
Esther David Mmari v. 200/- The case was brought before the High Court on an fuse Application for Reference. 1500/- This amount was reduced by the Taxing Master to Shs. Plaintiff fuse was successful, and submitted a Bill of Costs including an Instructions Fee of Shs.